<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Conflict and Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Conflict and Health</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/2/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/12" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/4">
        <title>Outbreak of chickenpox in a refugee camp of northern Thailand</title>
        <description>Although chickenpox is a generally mild, self-limited illness of children, it can cause fatal disease in adults. Accumulating reports from tropical countries showed a high prevalence of seronegativity among the adults, implying that varicella diseases could become a heavy burden in tropical countries. However, in the situation of humanitarian emergencies in tropical areas, chickenpox has largely been ignored as a serious communicable disease, due to lack of data regarding varicella mortality and hospital admissions in such a context. This is the first report describing an outbreak of chickenpox in a refugee camp of tropical region. In 2008, we experienced a varicella outbreak in ethnic Lao Hmong refugee camp in Phetchabun Province, northern Thailand. The attack rate was 4.0% (309/7,815) and this caused 3 hospitalizations including one who developed severe varicella pneumonia with respiratory failure. All hospitalizations were exclusively seen in adults, and the proportion of patients [greater than or equal to]15 years old was 13.6% (42/309). Because less exposure to varicella-zoster virus due to low population density has previously been suggested to be one of the reasons behind higher prevalence of susceptible adults in tropics, the influx of displaced people from rural areas to a densely populated asylum might result in many severe adult cases once a varicella outbreak occurs. Control interventions such as vaccination should be considered even in refugee camp, if the confluence of the risk factors present in this situation.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Yusuke Shimakawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olivier Camelique</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Koya Ariyoshi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2010, 4:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-4-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/2/1/15">
        <title>Providing HIV care in the aftermath of Kenya&apos;s post-election violence

Medecins Sans Frontieres&apos; lessons learned

January - March 2008
</title>
        <description>Kenya&apos;s post-election violence in early 2008 created considerable problems for health services, and in particular, those providing HIV care. It was feared that the disruptions in services would lead to widespread treatment interruption. MSF had been working in the Kibera slum for 10 years and was providing antiretroviral therapy to 1800 patients when the violence broke out. MSF responded to the crisis in a number of ways and managed to keep HIV services going. Treatment interruption was less than expected, and MSF profited from a number of &quot;lessons learned&quot; that could be applied to similar contexts where a stable situation suddenly deteriorates.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/2/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Tony Reid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian van Engelgem</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Telfer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcel Manzi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2008, 2:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-2-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/3">
        <title>The burden of acute respiratory infections in crisis-affected populations: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Crises due to armed conflict, forced displacement and natural disasters result in excess morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases. Historically, acute respiratory infections (ARIs) have received relatively little attention in the humanitarian sector. We performed a systematic review to generate evidence on the burden of ARI in crises, and inform prioritisation of relief interventions. We identified 36 studies published since 1980 reporting data on the burden (incidence, prevalence, proportional morbidity or mortality, case-fatality, attributable mortality rate) of ARI, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 and as diagnosed by a clinician, in populations who at the time of the study were affected by natural disasters, armed conflict, forced displacement, and nutritional emergencies. We described studies and stratified data by age group, but did not do pooled analyses due to heterogeneity in case definitions. The published evidence, mainly from refugee camps and surveillance or patient record review studies, suggests very high excess morbidity and mortality (20-35% proportional mortality) and case-fatality (up to 30-35%) due to ARI. However, ARI disease burden comparisons with non-crisis settings are difficult because of non-comparability of data. Better epidemiological studies with clearer case definitions are needed to provide the evidence base for priority setting and programme impact assessments. Humanitarian agencies should include ARI prevention and control among infants, children and adults as priority activities in crises. Improved data collection, case management and vaccine strategies will help to reduce disease burden.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Anna Bellos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kim Mulholland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine O'Brien</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shamim Qazi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michelle Gayer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francesco Checchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2010, 4:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-4-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/1">
        <title>Armed conflicts have an impact on the spread of tuberculosis: the case of the Somali Regional State of Ethiopia</title>
        <description>A pessimistic view of the impact of armed conflicts on the control of infectious diseases has generated great interest in the role of conflicts on the global TB epidemic. Nowhere in the world is such interest more palpable than in the Horn of Africa Region, comprising Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, Kenya and Sudan. An expanding literature has demonstrated that armed conflicts stall disease control programs through distraction of health system, interruption of patients&apos; ability to seek health care, and the diversion of economic resources to military ends rather than health needs. Nonetheless, until very recently, no research has been done to address the impact of armed conflict on TB epidemics in the Somali Regional State (SRS) of Ethiopia.
Methods:
This study is based on the cross-sectional data collected in 2007, utilizing structured questionnaires filled-out by a sample of 226 TB patients in the SRS of Ethiopia. Data was obtained on the delay patients experienced in receiving a diagnosis of TB, on the biomedical knowledge of TB that patients had, and the level of self-treatment by patients. The outcome variables in this study are the delay in the diagnosis of TB experienced by patients, and extent of self-treatment utilized by patients. Our main explanatory variable was place of residence, which was dichotomized as being in &apos;conflict zones&apos; and in &apos;non-conflict zones&apos;. Demographic data was collected for statistical control. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used on calculations of group differences. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between outcome and predictor variables.
Results:
Two hundred and twenty six TB patients were interviewed. The median delay in the diagnosis of TB was 120 days and 60 days for patients from conflict zones and from non-conflict zones, respectively. Moreover, 74% of the patients residing in conflict zones undertook self-treatment prior to their diagnosis. The corresponding proportion from non-conflict zones was 45%. Fully adjusted logistic regression analysis shows that patients from conflict zones had significantly greater odds of delay (OR = 3.06; 95% CI: 1.47-6.36) and higher self treatment utilization (OR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.56-7.12) compared to those from non-conflict zones.
Conclusion:
Patients from conflict zones have a longer delay in receiving a diagnosis of TB and have higher levels of self treatment utilization. This suggests that access to TB care should be improved by the expansion of user friendly directly observed therapy short-course (DOTS) in the conflict zones of the region.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Abdi Gele</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gunnar Bjune</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2010, 4:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-4-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/4">
        <title>Mortality, violence and access to care in 2 districts of Port-au-Prince, Haiti</title>
        <description>Background:
Towards the end of 2006 open conflict broke out between United Nations forces and armed militia in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Fighting was most intense in the district of Cit&#233; Soleil.
Methods:
A cross-sectional, random-sample survey among the conflict-affected populations living in Cit&#233; Soleil and Martissant was carried out over a 4-week period in 2006 using a semi-structured questionnaire to assess exposure to violence and access to health care. Household heads from 945 households (corresponding to 4,763 people) in Cit&#233; Soleil and 1,800 household (9,539 people) in Martissant provided information on household members. The average recall period was 579 days for Cit&#233; Soleil and 601 days for Martissant.
Results:
In Cit&#233; Soleil 120 deaths (21 children) were reported (CMR 0.4 deaths/10,000 people/day; &lt;5 MR 0.5 deaths/10,000/day) while in Martissant 165 deaths (8 children) were reported (CMR 0.3/10,000 people/day; &lt;5 MR 0.2/10,000 people/day). Violence was reported as the main cause of adult mortality in both locations (mainly gunshot wounds) accounting for 29.2% of deaths in Cit&#233; Soleil and 23% of deaths in Martissant. 22.9% of families in Cit&#233; Soleil and 18.6% in Martissant reported at least one victim of violence. Destruction of property and belongings was common in both Cit&#233; Soleil (52.4% of families) and Martissant (14.9%). Access to health services was limited, with 11% (22/196) of victims of violence in Cit&#233; Soleil and 23% (49/212) in Martissant unable to access care due to insecurity or lack of money.DiscussionExtrapolating to the total population of these two districts some 2,000 violent deaths occurred over the recall period. Among the survivors, violence had lasting effects in terms of physical and mental health and loss of property and possessions.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Frederique Ponsar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathan Ford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michel van Herp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Mancini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Bachy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2009, 3:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-3-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/2">
        <title>Conflict-affected displaced persons need to benefit more from 
HIV and malaria national strategic plans and Global Fund grants
</title>
        <description>Background:
Access to HIV and malaria control programmes for refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) is not only a human rights issue but a public health priority for affected populations and host populations. The primary source of funding for malaria and HIV programmes for many countries is the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund). This article analyses the current HIV and malaria National Strategic Plans (NSPs) and Global Fund approved proposals from rounds 1-8 for countries in Africa hosting populations with refugees and/or IDPs to document their inclusion.
Methods:
The review was limited to countries in Africa as they constitute the highest caseload of refugees and IDPs affected by HIV and malaria. Only countries with a refugee and/or IDP population of &#8805; 10,000 persons were included. NSPs were retrieved from primary and secondary sources while approved Global Fund proposals were obtained from the organisation&apos;s website. Refugee figures were obtained from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees&apos; database and IDP figures from the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The inclusion of refugees and IDPs was classified into three categories: 1) no reference; 2) referenced; and 3) referenced with specific activities.FindingsA majority of countries did not mention IDPs (57%) compared with 48% for refugees in their HIV NSPs. For malaria, refugees were not included in 47% of NSPs compared with 44% for IDPs. A minority (21-29%) of HIV and malaria NSPs referenced and included activities for refugees and IDPs. There were more approved Global Fund proposals for HIV than malaria for countries with both refugees and IDPs, respectively. The majority of countries with &#8805;10,000 refugees and IDPs did not include these groups in their approved proposals (61%-83%) with malaria having a higher rate of exclusion than HIV.InterpretationCountries that have signed the 1951 refugee convention have an obligation to care for refugees and this includes provision of health care. IDPs are citizens of their own country but like refugees may also not be a priority for Governments&apos; NSPs and funding proposals. Besides legal obligations, Governments have a public health imperative to include these groups in NSPs and funding proposals. Governments may wish to add a component for refugees that is additional to the needs for their own citizens. The inclusion of forcibly displaced persons in funding proposals may have positive direct effects for host populations as international and United Nations agencies often have strong logistical capabilities that could benefit both populations. For NSPs, strong and concerted advocacy at global, regional and country levels needs to occur to successfully ensure that affected populations are included in their plans. It is essential for their inclusion to occur if we are to reach the stated goal of universal access and the Millennium Development Goals.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Paul Spiegel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heiko Hering</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eugene Paik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marian Schilperoord</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2010, 4:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-4-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Civil conflict and sleeping sickness in Africa in general and Uganda in particular</title>
        <description>Conflict and war have long been recognized as determinants of infectious disease risk. Re-emergence of epidemic sleeping sickness in sub-Saharan Africa since the 1970s has coincided with extensive civil conflict in affected regions. Sleeping sickness incidence has placed increasing pressure on the health resources of countries already burdened by malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis. In areas of Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Angola, sleeping sickness occurs in epidemic proportions, and is the first or second greatest cause of mortality in some areas, ahead of HIV/AIDS. In Uganda, there is evidence of increasing spread and establishment of new foci in central districts. Conflict is an important determinant of sleeping sickness outbreaks, and has contributed to disease resurgence. This paper presents a review and characterization of the processes by which conflict has contributed to the occurrence of sleeping sickness in Africa. Conflict contributes to disease risk by affecting the transmission potential of sleeping sickness via economic impacts, degradation of health systems and services, internal displacement of populations, regional insecurity, and reduced access for humanitarian support. Particular focus is given to the case of sleeping sickness in south-eastern Uganda, where incidence increase is expected to continue. Disease intervention is constrained in regions with high insecurity; in these areas, political stabilization, localized deployment of health resources, increased administrative integration and national capacity are required to mitigate incidence. Conflict-related variables should be explicitly integrated into risk mapping and prioritization of targeted sleeping sickness research and mitigation initiatives.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Lea Berrang Ford</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2007, 1:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-1-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/4">
        <title>The trauma of ongoing conflict and displacement in Chechnya: quantitative assessment of living conditions, and psychosocial and general health status among war displaced in Chechnya and Ingushetia</title>
        <description>Background:
Conflict in Chechnya has resulted in over a decade of violence, human rights abuses, criminality and poverty, and a steady flow of displaced seeking refuge throughout the region. At the beginning of 2004 MSF undertook quantitative surveys among the displaced populations in Chechnya and neighbouring Ingushetia.
Methods:
Surveys were carried out in Ingushetia (January 2004) and Chechnya (February 2004) through systematic sampling. Various conflict-related factors contributing to ill health were researched to obtain information on displacement history, living conditions, and psychosocial and general health status.
Results:
The average length of displacement was five years. Conditions in both locations were poor, and people in both locations indicated food shortages (Chechnya (C): 13.3%, Ingushetia (I): 11.3%), and there was a high degree of dependency on outside help (C: 95.4%, I: 94.3%). Most people (C: 94%, I: 98%) were confronted with violence in the past. Many respondents had witnessed the killing of people (C: 22.7%, I: 24.1%) and nearly half of people interviewed witnessed arrests (C: 53.1%, I: 48.4%) and maltreatment (C: 56.2%, I: 44.5%). Approximately one third of those interviewed had directly experienced war-related violence. A substantial number of people interviewed &#8211; one third in Ingushetia (37.5%) and two-thirds in Chechnya (66.8%) &#8211; rarely felt safe. The violence was ongoing, with respondents reporting violence in the month before the survey (C: 12.5%, I: 4.6%). Results of the general health questionnaire (GHQ 28) showed that nearly all internally displaced persons interviewed were suffering from health complaints such as somatic complaints, anxiety/insomnia, depressive feelings or social dysfunction (C: 201, 78.5%, CI: 73.0% &#8211; 83.4%; I: 230, 81.3%, CI: 76.2% &#8211; 85.6%). Poor health status was reflected in other survey questions, but health services were difficult to access for around half the population (C: 54.3%, I: 46.6%).DiscussionThe study demonstrates that the health needs of internally displaced in both locations are similarly high and equally unaddressed. The high levels of past confrontation with violence and ongoing exposure in both locations is likely to contribute to a further deterioration of the health status of internally displaced. As of March 2007, concerns remain about how the return process is being managed by the authorities.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Kaz de Jong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Saskia van der Kam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nathan Ford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sally Hargreaves</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard van Oosten</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Debbie Cunningham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerry Boots</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elodie Andrault</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rolf Kleber</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2007, 1:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-1-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/8">
        <title>Learning lessons from field surveys in humanitarian contexts: a case study of field surveys conducted in North Kivu, DRC 2006-2008</title>
        <description>Survey estimates of mortality and malnutrition are commonly used to guide humanitarian decision-making. Currently, different methods of conducting field surveys are the subject of debate among epidemiologists. Beyond the technical arguments, decision makers may find it difficult to conceptualize what the estimates actually mean. For instance, what makes this particular situation an emergency? And how should the operational response be adapted accordingly. This brings into question not only the quality of the survey methodology, but also the difficulties epidemiologists face in interpreting results and selecting the most important information to guide operations. As a case study, we reviewed mortality and nutritional surveys conducted in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) published from January 2006 to January 2009. We performed a PubMed/Medline search for published articles and scanned publicly available humanitarian databases and clearinghouses for grey literature. To evaluate the surveys, we developed minimum reporting criteria based on available guidelines and selected peer-review articles. We identified 38 reports through our search strategy; three surveys met our inclusion criteria. The surveys varied in methodological quality. Reporting against minimum criteria was generally good, but presentation of ethical procedures, raw data and survey limitations were missed in all surveys. All surveys also failed to consider contextual factors important for data interpretation. From this review, we conclude that mechanisms to ensure sound survey design and conduct must be implemented by operational organisations to improve data quality and reporting. Training in data interpretation would also be useful. Novel survey methods should be trialled and prospective data gathering (surveillance) employed wherever feasible.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Grais</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francisco Luquero</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emmanuel Grellety</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heloise Pham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Coghlan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pierre Salignon</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2009, 3:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-3-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/12">
        <title>Use of facility assessment data to improve reproductive health service delivery in the Democratic Republic of the Congo</title>
        <description>Background:
Prolonged exposure to war has severely impacted the provision of health services in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Health infrastructure has been destroyed, health workers have fled and government support to health care services has been made difficult by ongoing conflict. Poor reproductive health (RH) indicators illustrate the effect that the prolonged crisis in DRC has had on the on the reproductive health (RH) of Congolese women. In 2007, with support from the RAISE Initiative, the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and CARE conducted baseline assessments of public hospitals to evaluate their capacities to meet the RH needs of the local populations and to determine availability, utilization and quality of RH services including emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and family planning (FP).
Methods:
Data were collected from facility assessments at nine general referral hospitals in five provinces in the DRC during March, April and November 2007. Interviews, observation and clinical record review were used to assess the general infrastructure, EmOC and FP services provided, and the infection prevention environment in each of the facilities.
Results:
None of the nine hospitals met the criteria for classification as an EmOC facility (either basic or comprehensive). Most facilities lacked any FP services. Shortage of trained staff, essential supplies and medicines and poor infection prevention practices were consistently documented. All facilities had poor systems for routine monitoring of RH services, especially with regard to EmOC.
Conclusions:
Women&apos;s lives can be saved and their well-being improved with functioning RH services. As the DRC stabilizes, IRC and CARE in partnership with the local Ministry of Health and other service provision partners are improving RH services by: 1) providing necessary equipment and renovations to health facilities; 2) improving supply management systems; 3) providing comprehensive competency-based training for health providers in RH and infection prevention; 4) improving referral systems to the hospitals; 5) advocating for changes in national RH policies and protocols; and 6) providing technical assistance for monitoring and evaluation of key RH indicators. Together, these initiatives will improve the quality and accessibility of RH services in the DRC - services which are urgently needed and to which Congolese women are entitled by international human rights law.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Sara Casey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathleen Mitchell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Immaculee Mulamba Amisi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Migombano Haliza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Blandine Aveledi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Prince Kalenga</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Judy Austin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2009, 3:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-3-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
