<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Conflict and Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Conflict and Health</description>
        <dc:date>2011-10-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/2/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/7" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/15">
        <title>Uranium and other contaminants in hair from the parents of children with congenital anomalies in Fallujah, Iraq</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent reports have drawn attention to increases in congenital birth anomalies and cancer in Fallujah Iraq blamed on teratogenic, genetic and genomic stress thought to result from depleted Uranium contamination following the battles in the town in 2004. Contamination of the parents of the children and of the environment by Uranium and other elements was investigated using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Hair samples from 25 fathers and mothers of children diagnosed with congenital anomalies were analysed for Uranium and 51 other elements. Mean ages of the parents was: fathers 29.6 (SD 6.2); mothers: 27.3 (SD 6.8). For a sub-group of 6 women, long locks of hair were analysed for Uranium along the length of the hair to obtain information about historic exposures. Samples of soil and water were also analysed and Uranium isotope ratios determined.
Results:
Levels of Ca, Mg, Co, Fe, Mn, V, Zn, Sr, Al, Ba, Bi, Ga, Pb, Hg, Pd and U (for mothers only) were significantly higher than published mean levels in an uncontaminated population in Sweden. In high excess were Ca, Mg, Sr, Al, Bi and Hg. Of these only Hg can be considered as a possible cause of congenital anomaly. Mean levels for Uranium were 0.16 ppm (SD: 0.11) range 0.02 to 0.4, higher in mothers (0.18 ppm SD 0.09) than fathers (0.11 ppm; SD 0.13). The highly unusual non-normal Fallujah distribution mean was significantly higher than literature results for a control population Southern Israel (0.062 ppm) and a non-parametric test (Mann Whitney-Wilcoxon) gave p = 0.016 for this comparison of the distribution. Mean levels in Fallujah were also much higher than the mean of measurements reported from Japan, Brazil, Sweden and Slovenia (0.04 ppm SD 0.02). Soil samples show low concentrations with a mean of 0.76 ppm (SD 0.42) and range 0.1-1.5 ppm; (N = 18). However it may be consistent with levels in drinking water (2.28 &#956;gL-1) which had similar levels to water from wells (2.72 &#956;gL-1) and the river Euphrates (2.24 &#956;gL-1). In a separate study of a sub group of mothers with long hair to investigate historic Uranium excretion the results suggested that levels were much higher in the past. Uranium traces detected in the soil samples and the hair showed slightly enriched isotopic signatures for hair U238/U235 = (135.16 SD 1.45) compared with the natural ratio of 137.88. Soil sample Uranium isotope ratios were determined after extraction and concentration of the Uranium by ion exchange. Results showed statistically significant presence of enriched Uranium with a mean of 129 with SD5.9 (for this determination, the natural Uranium 95% CI was 132.1 &lt; Ratio &lt; 144.1).
Conclusions:
Whilst caution must be exercised about ruling out other possibilities, because none of the elements found in excess are reported to cause congenital diseases and cancer except Uranium, these findings suggest the enriched Uranium exposure is either a primary cause or related to the cause of the congenital anomaly and cancer increases. Questions are thus raised about the characteristics and composition of weapons now being deployed in modern battlefields</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Samira Alaani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Muhammed Tafash</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Busby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Malak Hamdan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eleonore Blaurock-Busch</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2011, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-09-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-5-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-5-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-09-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/3">
        <title>Sexual violence in the protracted conflict of DRC: 
Programming for rape survivors in South Kivu
</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite international acknowledgement of the linkages between sexual violence and conflict, reliable data on its prevalence, the circumstances, characteristics of perpetrators, and physical or mental health impacts is rare. Among the conflicts that have been associated with widespread sexual violence has been the one in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
Methods:
From 2003 till to date Malteser International has run a medico-social support programme for rape survivors in South Kivu province, DRC. In the context of this programme, a host of data was collected. We present these data and discuss the findings within the frame of available literature.
Results:
Malteser International registered 20,517 female rape survivors in the three year period 2005&#8211;2007. Women of all ages have been targeted by sexual violence and only few of those &#8211; and many of them only after several years &#8211; sought medical care and psychological help. Sexual violence in the DRC frequently led to social, especially familial, exclusion. Members of military and paramilitary groups were identified as the main perpetrators of sexual violence.
Conclusion:
We have documented that in the DRC conflict sexual violence has been &#8211; and continues to be &#8211; highly prevalent in a wide area in the East of the country. Humanitarian programming in this field is challenging due to the multiple needs of rape survivors. The easily accessible, integrated medical and psycho-social care that the programme offered apparently responded to the needs of many rape survivors in this area.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Birthe Steiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marie Benner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Egbert Sondorp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>K. Schmitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ursula Mesmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandrine Rosenberger</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2009, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-3-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-3-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/2/1/1">
        <title>Iraq War mortality estimates: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Background:
In March 2003, the United States invaded Iraq. The subsequent number, rates, and causes of mortality in Iraq resulting from the war remain unclear, despite intense international attention. Understanding mortality estimates from modern warfare, where the majority of casualties are civilian, is of critical importance for public health and protection afforded under international humanitarian law. We aimed to review the studies, reports and counts on Iraqi deaths since the start of the war and assessed their methodological quality and results.
Methods:
We performed a systematic search of 15 electronic databases from inception to January 2008. In addition, we conducted a non-structured search of 3 other databases, reviewed study reference lists and contacted subject matter experts. We included studies that provided estimates of Iraqi deaths based on primary research over a reported period of time since the invasion. We excluded studies that summarized mortality estimates and combined non-fatal injuries and also studies of specific sub-populations, e.g. under-5 mortality. We calculated crude and cause-specific mortality rates attributable to violence and average deaths per day for each study, where not already provided.
Results:
Thirteen studies met the eligibility criteria. The studies used a wide range of methodologies, varying from sentinel-data collection to population-based surveys. Studies assessed as the highest quality, those using population-based methods, yielded the highest estimates. Average deaths per day ranged from 48 to 759. The cause-specific mortality rates attributable to violence ranged from 0.64 to 10.25 per 1,000 per year.
Conclusion:
Our review indicates that, despite varying estimates, the mortality burden of the war and its sequelae on Iraq is large. The use of established epidemiological methods is rare. This review illustrates the pressing need to promote sound epidemiologic approaches to determining mortality estimates and to establish guidelines for policy-makers, the media and the public on how to interpret these estimates.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/2/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Frederick Burkle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Tapp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kumanan Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tim Takaro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gordon Guyatt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hani Amad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2008, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-03-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-2-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-2-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-03-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>Six rapid assessments of alcohol and other substance use in populations displaced by conflict 

</title>
        <description>Background:
Substance use among populations displaced by conflict is a neglected area of public health. Alcohol, khat, benzodiazepine, opiate, and other substance use have been documented among a range of displaced populations, with wide-reaching health and social impacts. Changing agendas in humanitarian response-including increased prominence of mental health and chronic illness-have so far failed to be translated into meaningful interventions for substance use.
Methods:
Studies were conducted from 2006 to 2008 in six different settings of protracted displacement, three in Africa (Kenya, Liberia, northern Uganda) and three in Asia (Iran, Pakistan, and Thailand). We used intervention-oriented qualitative Rapid Assessment and Response methods, adapted from two decades of experience among non-displaced populations. The main sources of data were individual and group interviews conducted with a culturally representative (non-probabilistic) sample of community members and service providers.
Results:
Widespread use of alcohol, particularly artisanally-produced alcohol, in Kenya, Liberia, Uganda, and Thailand, and opiates in Iran and Pakistan was believed by participants to be linked to a range of health, social and protection problems, including illness, injury (intentional and unintentional), gender-based violence, risky behaviour for HIV and other sexually transmitted infection and blood-borne virus transmission, as well as detrimental effects to household economy. Displacement experiences, including dispossession, livelihood restriction, hopelessness and uncertain future may make communities particularly vulnerable to substance use and its impact, and changing social norms and networks (including the surrounding population) may result in changed - and potentially more harmful-patterns of use. Limited access to services, including health services, and exclusion from relevant host population programmes, may exacerbate the harmful consequences.
Conclusions:
The six studies show the feasibility and value of conducting rapid assessments in displaced populations. One outcome of these studies is the development of a UNHCR/WHO field guide on rapid assessment of alcohol and other substance use among conflict-affected populations. More work is required on gathering population-based epidemiological data, and much more experience is required on delivering effective interventions. Presentation of these findings should contribute to increased awareness, improved response, and more vigorous debate around this important but neglected area.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Nadine Ezard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edna Oppenheimer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ann Burton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marian Schilperoord</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Macdonald</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Moruf Adelekan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abandokoth Sakarati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Ommeren</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2011, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-02-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-5-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-5-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-02-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/22">
        <title>Vulnerability to High Risk Sexual Behaviour (HRSB) Following Exposure to War Trauma as Seen in Post-Conflict Communities in Eastern Uganda: A Qualitative Study</title>
        <description>Background:
Much of the literature on the relationship between conflict-related trauma and high risk sexual behaviour (HRSB) often focuses on refugees and not mass in-country displaced people due to armed conflicts. There is paucity of research about contexts underlying HRSB and HIV/AIDS in conflict and post-conflict communities in Uganda. Understanding factors that underpin vulnerability to HRSB in post-conflict communities is vital in designing HIV/AIDS prevention interventions. We explored the socio-cultural factors, social interactions, socio-cultural practices, social norms and social network structures that underlie war trauma and vulnerability to HRSB in a post-conflict population.
Methods:
We did a cross-sectional qualitative study of 3 sub-counties in Katakwi district and 1 in Amuria in Uganda between March and May 2009. We collected data using 8 FGDs, 32 key informant interviews and 16 in-depth interviews. We tape-recorded and transcribed the data. We followed thematic analysis principles to manage, analyse and interpret the data. We constantly identified and compared themes and sub-themes in the dataset as we read the transcripts. We used illuminating verbatim quotations to illustrate major findings.
Results:
The commonly identified HRSB behaviours include; transactional sex, sexual predation, multiple partners, early marriages and forced marriages. Breakdown of the social structure due to conflict had resulted in economic destruction and a perceived soaring of vulnerable people whose propensity to HRSB is high. Dishonour of sexual sanctity through transactional sex and practices like incest mirrored the consequence of exposure to conflict. HRSB was associated with concentration of people in camps where idleness and unemployment were the norm. Reports of girls and women who had been victims of rape and defilement by men with guns were common. Many people were known to have started to display persistent worries, hopelessness, and suicidal ideas and to abuse alcohol.
Conclusions:
The study demonstrated that conflicts disrupt the socio-cultural set up of communities and destroy sources of people&apos;s livelihood. Post-conflict socio-economic reconstruction needs to encompass programmes that restructure people&apos;s morals and values through counselling. HIV/AIDS prevention programming in post-conflict communities should deal with socio-cultural disruptions that emerged during conflicts. Some of the disruptions if not dealt with, could become normalized yet they are predisposing factors to HRSB. Socio-economic vulnerability as a consequence of conflict seemed to be associated with HRSB through alterations in sexual morality. To pursue safer sexual health choices, people in post-conflict communities need life skills.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Wilson Muhwezi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eugene Kinyanda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margaret Mungherera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Onyango</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emmanuel Ngabirano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julius Muron</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johnson Kagugube</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rehema Kajungu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2011, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-10-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-5-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-5-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/3">
        <title>The burden of acute respiratory infections in crisis-affected populations: a systematic review</title>
        <description>Crises due to armed conflict, forced displacement and natural disasters result in excess morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases. Historically, acute respiratory infections (ARIs) have received relatively little attention in the humanitarian sector. We performed a systematic review to generate evidence on the burden of ARI in crises, and inform prioritisation of relief interventions. We identified 36 studies published since 1980 reporting data on the burden (incidence, prevalence, proportional morbidity or mortality, case-fatality, attributable mortality rate) of ARI, as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 and as diagnosed by a clinician, in populations who at the time of the study were affected by natural disasters, armed conflict, forced displacement, and nutritional emergencies. We described studies and stratified data by age group, but did not do pooled analyses due to heterogeneity in case definitions. The published evidence, mainly from refugee camps and surveillance or patient record review studies, suggests very high excess morbidity and mortality (20-35% proportional mortality) and case-fatality (up to 30-35%) due to ARI. However, ARI disease burden comparisons with non-crisis settings are difficult because of non-comparability of data. Better epidemiological studies with clearer case definitions are needed to provide the evidence base for priority setting and programme impact assessments. Humanitarian agencies should include ARI prevention and control among infants, children and adults as priority activities in crises. Improved data collection, case management and vaccine strategies will help to reduce disease burden.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/4/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Anna Bellos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kim Mulholland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine O'Brien</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shamim Qazi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michelle Gayer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francesco Checchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2010, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-4-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-4-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Civil conflict and sleeping sickness in Africa in general and Uganda in particular</title>
        <description>Conflict and war have long been recognized as determinants of infectious disease risk. Re-emergence of epidemic sleeping sickness in sub-Saharan Africa since the 1970s has coincided with extensive civil conflict in affected regions. Sleeping sickness incidence has placed increasing pressure on the health resources of countries already burdened by malaria, HIV/AIDS, and tuberculosis. In areas of Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Angola, sleeping sickness occurs in epidemic proportions, and is the first or second greatest cause of mortality in some areas, ahead of HIV/AIDS. In Uganda, there is evidence of increasing spread and establishment of new foci in central districts. Conflict is an important determinant of sleeping sickness outbreaks, and has contributed to disease resurgence. This paper presents a review and characterization of the processes by which conflict has contributed to the occurrence of sleeping sickness in Africa. Conflict contributes to disease risk by affecting the transmission potential of sleeping sickness via economic impacts, degradation of health systems and services, internal displacement of populations, regional insecurity, and reduced access for humanitarian support. Particular focus is given to the case of sleeping sickness in south-eastern Uganda, where incidence increase is expected to continue. Disease intervention is constrained in regions with high insecurity; in these areas, political stabilization, localized deployment of health resources, increased administrative integration and national capacity are required to mitigate incidence. Conflict-related variables should be explicitly integrated into risk mapping and prioritization of targeted sleeping sickness research and mitigation initiatives.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Lea Berrang Ford</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2007, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-1-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-1-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-03-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/24">
        <title>Incidence and risk factors for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhea in children under 5 in UNHCR refugee camps: A retrospective study</title>
        <description>Background:
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) refugee camps are located predominantly in rural areas of Africa and Asia in protracted or post-emergency contexts. Recognizing the importance of malaria, pneumonia and diarrheal diseases as major causes of child morbidity and mortality in refugee camps, we analyzed data from the UNHCR Health Information System (HIS) to estimate incidence and risk factors for these diseases in refugee children younger than five years of age.
Methods:
Data from 90 UNHCR camps in 16 countries, including morbidity, mortality, health services and refugee health status, were obtained from the UNHCR HIS for the period January 2006 to February 2010. Monthly camp-level data were aggregated to yearly estimates for analysis and stratified by location in Africa (including Yemen) or Asia. Poisson regression models with random effects were constructed to identify factors associated with malaria, pneumonia and diarrheal diseases. Spatial patterns in the incidence of malaria, pneumonia and diarrheal diseases were mapped to identify regional heterogeneities.
Results:
Malaria and pneumonia were the two most common causes of mortality, with confirmed malaria and pneumonia each accounting for 20% of child deaths. Suspected and confirmed malaria accounted for 23% of child morbidity and pneumonia accounted for 17% of child morbidity. Diarrheal diseases were the cause of 7% of deaths and 10% of morbidity in children under five. Mean under-five incidence rates across all refugee camps by region were: malaria [Africa 84.7 cases/1000 U5 population/month (95% CI 67.5-102.0), Asia 2.2/1000/month (95% CI 1.4-3.0)]; pneumonia [Africa 59.2/1000/month (95% CI 49.8-68.7), Asia 254.5/1000/month (95% CI 207.1-301.8)]; and diarrheal disease [Africa 35.5/1000/month (95% CI 28.7-42.4), Asia 69.2/1000/month (95% CI 61.0-77.5)]. Measles was infrequent and accounted for a small proportion of child morbidity (503 cases, &lt; 1%) and mortality (6 deaths, &lt; 1%).
Conclusions:
As in stable settings, pneumonia and diarrhea are important causes of mortality among refugee children. Malaria remains a significant cause of child mortality in refugee camps in Africa and will need to be addressed as part of regional malaria control and elimination efforts. Little is known of neonatal morbidity and mortality in refugee settings, and neonatal deaths are likely to be under-reported. Global measles control efforts have reduced the incidence of measles among refugee children.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Hershey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shannon Doocy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamie Anderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Haskew</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Spiegel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Moss</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2011, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-10-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-5-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-5-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-10-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Challenges of controlling sleeping sickness in areas of violent conflict: experience in the Democratic Republic of Congo</title>
        <description>Background:
Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), or sleeping sickness, is a fatal neglected tropical disease if left untreated. HAT primarily affects people living in rural sub-Saharan Africa, often in regions afflicted by violent conflict. Screening and treatment of HAT is complex and resource-intensive, and especially difficult in insecure, resource-constrained settings. The country with the highest endemicity of HAT is the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which has a number of foci of high disease prevalence. We present here the challenges of carrying out HAT control programmes in general and in a conflict-affected region of DRC. We discuss the difficulties of measuring disease burden, medical care complexities, waning international support, and research and development barriers for HAT.DiscussionIn 2007, M&#233;decins Sans Fronti&#232;res (MSF) began screening for HAT in the Haut-U&#233;l&#233; and Bas-U&#233;l&#233; districts of Orientale Province in northeastern DRC, an area of high prevalence affected by armed conflict. Through early 2009, HAT prevalence rate of 3.4% was found, reaching 10% in some villages. More than 46,000 patients were screened and 1,570 treated for HAT during this time. In March 2009, two treatment centres were forced to close due to insecurity, disrupting patient treatment, follow-up, and transmission-control efforts. One project was reopened in December 2009 when the security situation improved, and another in late 2010 based on concerns that population displacement might reactivate historic foci. In all of 2010, 770 patients were treated at these sites, despite a limited geographical range of action for the mobile teams.SummaryIn conflict settings where HAT is prevalent, targeted medical interventions are needed to provide care to the patients caught in these areas. Strategies of integrating care into existing health systems may be unfeasible since such infrastructure is often absent in resource-poor contexts. HAT care in conflict areas must balance logistical and medical capacity with security considerations, and community networks and international-response coordination should be maintained. Research and development for less complicated, field-adapted tools for diagnosis and treatment, and international support for funding and program implementation, are urgently needed to facilitate HAT control in these remote and insecure areas.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Jacqueline Tong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Olaf Valverde</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claude Mahoudeau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Oliver Yun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francois Chappuis</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2011, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-5-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-5-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/7">
        <title>Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings</title>
        <description>Humanitarian agencies are increasingly engaged in research in conflict and post-conflict settings. This is justified by the need to improve the quality of assistance provided in these settings and to collect evidence of the highest standard to inform advocacy and policy change. The instability of conflict-affected areas, and the heightened vulnerability of populations caught in conflict, calls for careful consideration of the research methods employed, the levels of evidence sought, and ethical requirements. Special attention needs to be placed on the feasibility and necessity of doing research in conflict-settings, and the harm-benefit ratio for potential research participants.</description>
        <link>http://www.conflictandhealth.com/content/3/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Nathan Ford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rony Zachariah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ross Upshur</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Conflict and Health 2009, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1752-1505-3-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1752-1505-3-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Conflict and Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1752-1505</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

